Sato Check · Package
clawhub
npm:clawhub · v0.23.3 · sha256:c313bba52d19 · as of 2026-09-26
- Does it take your key? no evidence
- No private-key read found in what we read of its setup and published code — the limits say how much that was.
- No evidence line on file for this question yet.
- Does your key leave? observed
- Not observed — no planted key left during install and start-up, under our test conditions — code paths that only run later, or only on a trigger, are not covered.
- We ran it with planted test keys and saw it.
- Can it move funds on its own? no evidence
- Unknown — we could not read what it exposes.
- No evidence line on file for this question yet.
- What changed? no evidence
- First profile of this subject — nothing to compare yet.
- No evidence line on file for this question yet.
Is this your project? Respond →Dispute this reading
Hosts contacted
| Host | When | Role | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| api.github.com | code | registry | traced |
| clawhub.ai | code | vendor | traced |
| codeload.github.com | code | registry | traced |
| docs.openclaw.ai | code | vendor | traced |
| github.com | code | registry | traced |
| spdx.org | code | other | traced |
| registry.npmjs.org | install | registry | observed |
Evidence (7 lines)
- observedO-hosts2026-09-25
registry.npmjs.org was contacted during install (registry).
sandbox:obs_252b0a916dc812fc
- tracedT-hosts2026-09-26
api.github.com appears in shipped code (registry).
dist/cli/commands/github.js
- tracedT-hosts2026-09-26
clawhub.ai appears in shipped code (vendor).
dist/cli/registry.js
- tracedT-hosts2026-09-26
codeload.github.com appears in shipped code (registry).
dist/cli/commands/skills.js
- tracedT-hosts2026-09-26
docs.openclaw.ai appears in shipped code (vendor).
dist/cli/commands/packages.js
- tracedT-hosts2026-09-26
github.com appears in shipped code (registry).
dist/cli/commands/github.js
- tracedT-hosts2026-09-26
spdx.org appears in shipped code (other).
dist/schema/license.js
Limits
- Traced analysis follows flows inside one module only; a key handed from one module to another is not followed.
- Key egress not observed during install and start-up, under our test conditions — code paths that only run later, or only on a trigger, are not covered.
- No tool inventory was available, so fund actions were not read.
- Sandbox: DNS queries made directly by the target are not logged; hosts are recorded from proxied HTTP(S) requests and CONNECTs..
- Sandbox: Code that ignores HTTP(S)_PROXY has no route out of the sandbox, so its attempts are not captured..
A profile describes what we read and ran, with dates. It is not a safety rating, an audit or an endorsement, and "not found" is not "not there".
sato.custody/v1 · custody-1
Maintain this project? Respond to this reading
Loading sign-in…