Sato Hub
Q402 (Quack AI) verification record

Score history

Q402 (Quack AI)

Every Sato Hub Sato Score reading we have captured for this listing, one per day, each dated. Days we changed the scoring method are marked separately from days the project moved. How open, active and verifiable — not a safety, quality, or returns grade.

Score today

67

Change over 12d

+29

Days measured

12

Days missed

0

Sato Score, daily

2026-09-022026-09-13
02550751002026-09-02: 38 (Low)2026-09-03: 38 (Low)2026-09-04: 38 (Low)2026-09-05: 38 (Low)2026-09-06: 38 (Low)2026-09-07: 38 (Low)2026-09-08: 38 (Low)2026-09-09: 38 (Low)2026-09-10: 62 (Medium)2026-09-11: 67 (Medium)2026-09-12: 67 (Medium)2026-09-13: 67 (Medium)3867672026-09-022026-09-13

Every day in this span has a reading. A dashed vertical mark () is a day Sato Hub changed the scoring method — movement on those days is ours, not the project’s.

Every day the score moved

2 changes attributable to the project, 0 caused by a revision of the scoring method.

DateFromToChangeCause
2026-09-116267+5the project
2026-09-103862+24the project

What moved, component by component

Six charts, six axes — each scaled to its own maximum weight. They are never stacked on one axis: a component worth 10 points and one worth 35 would not be comparable on a shared scale, and the small one is usually the one that moved.

Maintenance & liveness35/35
35
Code transparency12/20
20
Interface verifiability0/10
10
Docs & demo6/10
10
Listing transparency & provenance10/15
15
Independent verification4/10
10

The observed record

100% of Sato Hub's own daily checks succeeded over 12 checks. This is the share of OUR checks that succeeded. It is not uptime: a failed check can be on our side, and before 2026-09-01 no failure recorded why.

2026-09-02: answered our check2026-09-03: answered our check2026-09-04: answered our check2026-09-05: answered our check2026-09-06: answered our check2026-09-07: answered our check2026-09-08: answered our check2026-09-09: answered our check2026-09-10: answered our check2026-09-11: answered our check2026-09-12: answered our check2026-09-13: answered our check
  • answered
  • host answered with an error
  • failed on our side
  • failed, unattributable

Every reading

The table the charts are drawn from. A missing day is missing from this table too — nothing is filled in.

DateScoreTierStatusOur check
2026-09-1367MediumUnknownup
2026-09-1267MediumUnknownup
2026-09-1167MediumUnknownup
2026-09-1062MediumUnknownup
2026-09-0938LowUnknownup
2026-09-0838LowUnknownup
2026-09-0738LowUnknownup
2026-09-0638LowUnknownup
2026-09-0538LowUnknownup
2026-09-0438LowUnknownup
2026-09-0338LowUnknownup
2026-09-0238LowUnknownup

What happened alongside it

Releases, status changes, applied corrections and answered disputes, on the same dates — so a movement in the line can be read against an event rather than guessed at.

  1. Sep 11, 2026
    Auto-enriched: supported integrations, creator name, has pricing
  2. Sep 10, 2026
    Edited: deploy spec
  3. Sep 10, 2026
    Edited: github url, website url
  4. Sep 10, 2026
    Sato Score tier: Low → Medium
    Score 38 → 62.
  5. Sep 2, 2026
    Listed on Sato Hub
  6. Sep 2, 2026
    Sato Hub began tracking this listing

How to read this

  • · Every point is one UTC day. A day we did not capture is drawn as a gap, never joined across.
  • · A change on a marked methodology day is ours, not the project’s.
  • · The score says how open, active and verifiable the project is. It is not a safety, quality or returns grade.
  • · The inputs behind today’s score are published at /api/export/score-inputs.json and the arithmetic is reproducible on your own machine.