Sato Hub
TermiX verification record

Score history

TermiX

Every Sato Hub Sato Score reading we have captured for this listing, one per day, each dated. Days we changed the scoring method are marked separately from days the project moved. How open, active and verifiable — not a safety, quality, or returns grade.

Score today

42

Change over 12d

+12

Days measured

12

Days missed

0

Sato Score, daily

2026-09-022026-09-13
02550751002026-09-02: 30 (Low)2026-09-03: 30 (Low)2026-09-04: 30 (Low)2026-09-05: 30 (Low)2026-09-06: 30 (Low)2026-09-07: 30 (Low)2026-09-08: 30 (Low)2026-09-09: 30 (Low)2026-09-10: 42 (Medium)2026-09-11: 42 (Medium)2026-09-12: 42 (Medium)2026-09-13: 42 (Medium)3042422026-09-022026-09-13

Every day in this span has a reading. A dashed vertical mark () is a day Sato Hub changed the scoring method — movement on those days is ours, not the project’s.

Every day the score moved

1 change attributable to the project, 0 caused by a revision of the scoring method.

DateFromToChangeCause
2026-09-103042+12the project

What moved, component by component

Six charts, six axes — each scaled to its own maximum weight. They are never stacked on one axis: a component worth 10 points and one worth 35 would not be comparable on a shared scale, and the small one is usually the one that moved.

Maintenance & liveness20/35
35
Code transparency11/20
20
Interface verifiability0/10
10
Docs & demo6/10
10
Listing transparency & provenance5/15
15
Independent verification0/10
10

The observed record

100% of Sato Hub's own daily checks succeeded over 12 checks. This is the share of OUR checks that succeeded. It is not uptime: a failed check can be on our side, and before 2026-09-01 no failure recorded why.

2026-09-02: answered our check2026-09-03: answered our check2026-09-04: answered our check2026-09-05: answered our check2026-09-06: answered our check2026-09-07: answered our check2026-09-08: answered our check2026-09-09: answered our check2026-09-10: answered our check2026-09-11: answered our check2026-09-12: answered our check2026-09-13: answered our check
  • answered
  • host answered with an error
  • failed on our side
  • failed, unattributable

Every reading

The table the charts are drawn from. A missing day is missing from this table too — nothing is filled in.

DateScoreTierStatusOur check
2026-09-1342MediumUnknownup
2026-09-1242MediumUnknownup
2026-09-1142MediumUnknownup
2026-09-1042MediumUnknownup
2026-09-0930LowUnknownup
2026-09-0830LowUnknownup
2026-09-0730LowUnknownup
2026-09-0630LowUnknownup
2026-09-0530LowUnknownup
2026-09-0430LowUnknownup
2026-09-0330LowUnknownup
2026-09-0230LowUnknownup

What happened alongside it

Releases, status changes, applied corrections and answered disputes, on the same dates — so a movement in the line can be read against an event rather than guessed at.

  1. Sep 10, 2026
    Edited: deploy spec
  2. Sep 10, 2026
    Edited: github url, website url
  3. Sep 10, 2026
    Sato Score tier: Low → Medium
    Score 30 → 42.
  4. Sep 2, 2026
    Listed on Sato Hub
  5. Sep 2, 2026
    Sato Hub began tracking this listing

How to read this

  • · Every point is one UTC day. A day we did not capture is drawn as a gap, never joined across.
  • · A change on a marked methodology day is ours, not the project’s.
  • · The score says how open, active and verifiable the project is. It is not a safety, quality or returns grade.
  • · The inputs behind today’s score are published at /api/export/score-inputs.json and the arithmetic is reproducible on your own machine.