Sato Hub
Trading Tool

CryptoIZ MCP

Solana DEX smart-money signal MCP server (whale accumulation, divergence, BTC regime) sold pay-per-call via x402.

  • Sato Score58
  • ChainsSolana
ActiveUnverifiedQuiet · 6mo ago

CryptoIZ MCP is an open-source trading tool on Solana, with last code activity on 2026-04-29 (Quiet). Latest release on 2026-04-27. Sato Score 58/100 (how open, active and verifiable it is, not a safety grade), as of 2026-10-21. How the score works →

See how to install CryptoIZ MCP →

Last commit Apr 29, 2026 · Last release Apr 27, 2026 · ★ 1

Listed from cryptoiz.org on 2026-07-19. Install: reproduced by Sato Hub on 2026-10-19. Evidence →

Next step

Watch CryptoIZ MCP

One email if what we observe changes — its repo goes quiet or disappears, or the listing is retired. Nothing else.

Check it from your agent

Add Sato Hub’s MCP server (no key), then ask:

https://satohub.ai/api/mcp
Run Sato Hub Preflight on dadang11/cryptoiz-mcp before I use it.
Full setup: Claude Code, Cursor, others →

Your project?

Prove you control the domain and correct this page — description, links, tags, chains. A claim proves control, not verification: it never changes the Sato Score.

Claim this listing →

Overview

CryptoIZ MCP exposes Solana DEX whale-intelligence signals — accumulation/distribution tracking, price-volume divergence, and BTC macro-regime reads — as MCP tools, with paid tools priced per call ($0.02-$0.10 USDC) via the x402 protocol and a small free tier (token lookup, server status). An agent builder uses it to feed a trading agent smart-money signals on Solana without managing a separate subscription, paying only for the calls it makes.

Sato Score

58/100· Medium

How open, active & verifiable — not a safety or returns grade.

Maintenance & liveness
20/35
Code transparency
17/20
Interface verifiability
8/10
Docs & demo
0/10
Listing transparency & provenance
11/15
Independent verification
2/10

Deploy path reproduced — install verified in an isolated container (proves installability, not runtime safety).

Sato Check

v0.17.1 · as of 2026-09-29
Does it take your key?
Reads a key
Does your key leave?
Not yet run
Can it move funds on its own?
Unknown
Full profile, evidence and limits →

A profile describes what we read and ran, with dates. It is not a safety rating, an audit or an endorsement, and "not found" is not "not there".

Evidence — listed vs checked · what the words mean

Listed from cryptoiz.org on 2026-07-19. Install: reproduced by Sato Hub on 2026-10-19.

ClaimValueEvidenceSourceChecked
Chains supportedSolanaself-reportedcryptoiz.orgas of 2026-10-21
Verification statusUnverified — not independently reviewedself-reportedcryptoiz.orgas of 2026-10-21
Recent activitylast release 2026-04-27 · last commit 2026-04-29observedgithub.com/dadang11/cryptoiz-mcp2026-10-21
Install worksreproduced — install and entry both completedshows the install path works as written; not a statement about runtime behaviour✓ reproducedgithub.com/dadang11/cryptoiz-mcp2026-10-19
Website answersanswered (HTTP 200)observedcryptoiz.org2026-10-21
Daily check record89 of 90 daily checks since 2026-07-23 succeededa success rate of our checks, not uptime; the source is this listing's own historyobserved—2026-10-20
Takes your keyreads private-key materialtracedsatohub.ai2026-09-29
Key leaves the machinenot yet run with planted test keysthe sandbox lane has not run on this versionobservedsatohub.ainot dated
Moves funds on its ownunknown — could not read what it exposestracedsatohub.ai2026-09-29
Works withClaude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, agentcashconfidence 0.85self-reportedgithub.com/dadang11/cryptoiz-mcpas of 2026-09-15
X accounthttps://twitter.com/cryptoiz_IDNconfidence 0.90self-reportedgithub.com/dadang11/cryptoiz-mcpas of 2026-09-15
Sato Score58/100 (Medium)how open, active and verifiable — not a safety or quality gradecomputedsatohub.ai2026-10-21

Self-reported rows are the project’s own words, dated when we recorded them — not a check. Only reproduced and reviewed rows carry a mark. None of these rows is a safety or quality rating.

Install — reproduced in a container Oct 19, 2026

Runtime: Node.js (npm global package "cryptoiz-mcp"); alternate managed-wallet install via the "agentcash" CLI

npx agentcash add https://mcp.cryptoiz.org
npm install -g cryptoiz-mcp
cryptoiz-mcp (global npm binary — README does not show the exact MCP client JSON block for the self-custody path)

You supply: SVM_PRIVATE_KEY — base58-encoded Solana private key, required for the self-custody/legacy install path; RISK: a live-funds signing key entered directly into the MCP config/env, and the tool spends $0.02–$0.10 USDC per paid tool call against the funded wallet, the recommended agentcash path avoids exposing the key by auto-generating an isolated wallet at ~/.agentcash/wallet.json, funded separately via npx agentcash fund

MCP invocation: cryptoiz-mcp (stdio) for self-custody, or the hosted https://mcp.cryptoiz.org endpoint via the agentcash-generated wallet

Read from the project’s own docs as of 2026-10-19. What a deploy spec is →

Observed record — 91 daily checks since 2026-07-23

98.9%of 91 checks since 2026-07-23 succeeded
Currently responding for 43 days
Succeeded
90
Failed
1
Their error
0
Unattributed
1

State changed on 2026-09-08 (responding → unreachable from our probe), 2026-09-09 (unreachable from our probe → responding).

This is the share of our daily checks that succeeded — not an availability guarantee. A check can fail because the host was down, because our runner timed out, or because the network in between dropped it, and only the first of those is a fact about this project. Failures are split by what we can attribute; anything we cannot attribute is counted, not hidden. 40 of these checks predate 2026-09-01, when the probe counted a bot-block (HTTP 403) as a failure and recorded no reason for any failure. Every one of them passed, so the rate covers them too.

Last 30 days — to 2026-10-21, one point per UTC day

Share of OUR checks that succeeded
100%
7-day rolling; unattributable days are gaps · 30/30 days
Tools listed
fewer than 2 points—
from the server's own tools/list · 0/30 days
Sato Score
58
as snapshotted that day · 29/30 days

A gap is a day we have no attributable observation — never a zero. Thirty points is the whole shape the free layer carries; the daily rows behind it stay in the snapshot series.

Details

Chains
Solana
Agent types
MCP server
Open source
Yes
Pricing
Pay-per-call via x402, $0.02-$0.10 USDC; free tier for basic tools
Works with
Claude Desktop, Cursor, Codex, agentcash
Last checked
2026-10-21

Marketplace Signals

No marketplace signals recorded for this resource yet.

Verification status reflects evidence reviewed by Sato Hub. Self-reported claims are never presented as verified.

#mcp#solana#trading-signals#x402#whale-tracking
See something inaccurate or outdated?Submit a correction →

Listing History

Recorded changes to CryptoIZ MCP's listing — status, verification, Sato Score, and recent releases. Full history is kept in the listing record.

  1. Oct 19, 2026
    Verified: deploy spec
  2. Sep 26, 2026
    Edited: entity class, resource type
  3. Sep 15, 2026
    Auto-enriched: x url, has pricing, supported integrations
  4. Sep 9, 2026
    Sato Score tier: Low → Medium
    Score 39 → 45.
  5. Sep 8, 2026
    Sato Score tier: Medium → Low
    Score 46 → 39.
  6. Jul 24, 2026
    Sato Hub began tracking this listing
  7. Jul 19, 2026
    Listed on Sato Hub

Compared with

Appears in

Related Resources

Reference

QuestionsShowHide

Questions people ask about CryptoIZ MCP

Is CryptoIZ MCP open source?
Yes. CryptoIZ MCP is open source under the MIT license; the repository is https://github.com/dadang11/cryptoiz-mcp. Checked as of 2026-10-21.
Which chains does CryptoIZ MCP support?
CryptoIZ MCP lists support for Solana as of 2026-10-21.
Is CryptoIZ MCP still maintained?
The most recent code activity Sato Hub observed was on 2026-04-29 (last commit 2026-04-29, last release 2026-04-27), which Sato Hub labels "Quiet". Posts on X are not counted as maintenance. Activity is a recency signal, not a quality judgment.
How do I install or run CryptoIZ MCP?
Node.js (npm global package "cryptoiz-mcp"); alternate managed-wallet install via the "agentcash" CLI. Install: npx agentcash add https://mcp.cryptoiz.org && npm install -g cryptoiz-mcp. Entry: cryptoiz-mcp (global npm binary — README does not show the exact MCP client JSON block for the self-custody path). Sato Hub reproduced this install in a container on 2026-10-19. It runs as an MCP server (cryptoiz-mcp (stdio) for self-custody, or the hosted https://mcp.cryptoiz.org endpoint via the agentcash-generated wallet).
Is CryptoIZ MCP verified on Sato Hub?
Sato Hub holds one earned check for CryptoIZ MCP: Deploy path reproduced — install verified in an isolated container (proves installability, not runtime safety). Its Sato Score is 58 of 100, a measure of how open, active and verifiable the project is, not a safety, quality or returns grade.
Cite this pageShowHide

Cite this page

Sato Hub. "CryptoIZ MCP — Sato Hub." Sato Hub, updated 2026-10-21, accessed 2026-10-21. https://satohub.ai/resources/cryptoiz-mcp

Data last refreshed 2026-10-21; this page is rebuilt daily. Citations carry the date so a reader can tell which snapshot a claim came from. Catalog data is licensed CC-BY-4.0.

Join the Sato Hub Briefing

Sign up for the Briefing: the agents, tools, and infrastructure that actually shipped, and why they matter.