Sato Hub
Verification record

Aerodrome

Its Sato Score and verification record. Not a safety, quality or returns grade.

ActiveVerified

Sato Score

58/100· Medium

How open, active & verifiable — not a safety or returns grade.

Maintenance & liveness
20/35
Code transparency
16/20
Interface verifiability
0/10
Docs & demo
6/10
Listing transparency & provenance
8/15
Independent verification
8/10

Independently verified — listing reviewed against evidence, never self-reported.

Next step

Check it from your agent

Add Sato Hub’s MCP server (no key), then ask:

https://satohub.ai/api/mcp
Ask Sato Hub what is on record about Aerodrome before I use it.
Full setup: Claude Code, Cursor, others →

Your project?

Prove you control the domain and correct this page — description, links, tags, chains. A claim proves control, not verification: it never changes the Sato Score.

Claim this listing →

Anchored

2026-11-05 · 492 listings

This score was committed to a single Merkle root along with every other score we published that day. The root is signed, published, and archivable by anyone — so if we changed this number tomorrow and said it had always been this, the commitment would contradict us. It proves what we published, not that the score is right.

Leaf
4ac7cbfe28a3bc8ffba88cacc0cdad19da1c71513bf7b4eb6c42acd0e26793f5
Preimage
satohub-score-leaf/v1|2026-11-05|aerodrome-finance|58|Medium
Proof
9 siblings
Root
6cb872fc24431d797738ee5cabdbc0f41d50175f4039b6f46a37239b54f94293
Root signature
Ed25519, kid b04bd38b
On-chain
not attested on-chain — key absent (ATTEST_PRIVATE_KEY is not set)

Verify this yourself

# 1. The proof: record, leaf, leaf_preimage, proof (sibling digests)
curl -s "https://satohub.ai/api/verify/aerodrome-finance/proof?date=2026-11-05"
# 2. The roots file, fetched separately; take the root for 2026-11-05
curl -s https://satohub.ai/.well-known/sato-score-roots.json
# 3. leaf = SHA-256(leaf_preimage). For each sibling s:
#    leaf = SHA-256("satohub-score-node/v1" || min(leaf,s) || max(leaf,s))
#    The result must equal the root from step 2.
# 4. Check that root's signature against https://satohub.ai/.well-known/jwks.json

No command-line tool is published for score proofs yet; the steps above are the whole check. Compare against the published roots file, not against the root in the proof response — checking a proof only against a root served in the same reply proves nothing. Raw proof: /api/verify/aerodrome-finance/proof. Method: the house rules.

Evidence

Record

Last checked
2026-11-05
Every score reading we have captured for this listing, one per day — the part of the record that cannot be backfilled.History →

Verification history

A dated, auditable record of every change to this listing's status, verification, and Sato Score.

  1. Aug 8, 2026
    Sato Hub began tracking this listing
  2. Jul 20, 2026
    Edited: deploy spec

Embed this badge

Sato Score badge previewLive preview
[![Sato Score](https://satohub.ai/api/badge/aerodrome-finance)](https://satohub.ai/verify/aerodrome-finance?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed)

Paste into your README. The badge reflects the live Sato Score and links back to this report. Free to use, no attribution required.

Embed the 90-day history

Sato Score, 90-day history badge previewLive preview
[![Sato Score, 90-day history](https://satohub.ai/api/badge/aerodrome-finance/history.svg)](https://satohub.ai/verify/aerodrome-finance/history?utm_source=badge&utm_medium=embed)

Paste into your README. The sparkline is the last 90 days of daily Sato Score readings with the 90-day change; days nobody measured are drawn as gaps, never joined across. It links back to the full dated record. Free to use, no attribution required.

Think this score is wrong?

Check it first: every input behind it is published at /api/export/score-inputs.json and the scorer is a verbatim copy of ours, so the arithmetic can be run on your own machine — reproduce this score. If you maintain Aerodrome and still disagree, say so in public: a dispute is published with your evidence beside our answer, whether or not we agree with it.

Want your project independently verified?Request verification →