Jupiter vs 1inch
Same axes, every row read live from the directory. No winner declared.
- Jupiter Sato Score77
- 1inch Sato Score77
- Updated2026-10-27
An agent that needs a swap route reaches for an aggregator, and these are the two names it hears. They are not substitutes: Jupiter aggregates Solana liquidity, 1inch aggregates EVM liquidity. Pick the chain first and the aggregator is mostly picked for you — the interesting question only starts after that.
What is worth comparing is everything the chain decision does not settle: how each is maintained, how much is published as source, what interfaces an agent can actually call, and whether anyone has reproduced the setup. Those rows are read live from the directory rather than typed into copy that would rot.
Jupiter
ActiveSolana swap aggregator that routes trades across DEXs via a widely used API and SDKs.
1inch
ActiveMultichain DEX aggregator with a developer API suite and an official MCP server for AI-agent swap execution.
On the same axes
| Jupiter | 1inch | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Trading Tool | Trading Tool |
| Chains | Solana | Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, BNB Chain, Multichain, Solana, Gnosis, Monad, zkSync |
| Interfaces | mcp, sdk, rest-api, contract | mcp, rest-api, contract |
| Standards | mcp | mcp |
| Open source | Partial | Partial |
| Listing status | Active | Active |
| Last commit or release | 2026-08-04 | 2026-10-25 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-11 |
| Install proofA reproduced install means the documented setup was actually run, not that the project is safe. | Reproduced install | Self-reported install |
| VerificationSelf-reported is not verified. Only Verified and Audited are earned states. | Verified | Verified |
| Sato ScoreHow open, active and verifiable the project is — not a safety, quality or returns grade. | 77 | 77 |
| GitHub starsA popularity signal, not a quality one. Listed last for that reason. | 183 | 60 |
Pick Jupiter if
- ·Your agent trades on Solana, where 1inch does not reach.
- ·You want the route and the transaction from the same API, which is what most Solana agent stacks are built around.
- ·You are pairing it with Solana-native tooling — a Solana agent kit, a Solana MCP server — and want one liquidity story across them.
Pick 1inch if
- ·Your agent trades on EVM chains, where Jupiter does not reach.
- ·You need one aggregator across several EVM networks rather than one per chain.
- ·You want a long-lived, widely integrated EVM routing surface with a large body of existing integration code to copy from.
What this cannot tell you
Neither row in this table is an execution-quality measurement. Which aggregator returns a better fill for your size, your pair and your slippage tolerance is not something the directory observes, and no figure here should be read as a price claim. Quoted output is also not a fill: routes are quoted before signing and can move. If execution quality is the decision, benchmark both against your own order flow.
Related
Reference
QuestionsWhat people ask about this pageShowHide
Questions this comparison answers
- Is Jupiter or 1inch more actively maintained?
- Jupiter is a partly open-source venue by Jupiter Exchange on Solana, last commit or release 2026-08-04, with a Sato Score of 77 out of 100 as of 2026-10-27. 1inch is a partly open-source venue by 1inch Network on Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum and 9 more chains, last commit or release 2026-10-25, with a Sato Score of 77 out of 100 as of 2026-10-27. Activity is a recency signal from public commits, releases and posts, not a quality judgment.
- Which one is open source?
- Jupiter: Partial. 1inch: Partial. "Unknown" means Sato Hub found no license statement.
- Does Sato Hub declare a winner?
- No. Every row is read live from the directory and the page names what the data cannot settle. Neither row in this table is an execution-quality measurement. Which aggregator returns a better fill for your size, your pair and your slippage tolerance is not something the directory observes, and no figure here should be read as a price claim. Quoted output is also not a fill: routes are quoted before signing and can move. If execution quality is the decision, benchmark both against your own order flow.
SourcesWhere the data comes fromShowHide
Sources — both projects' repositories and docs
Cite this pagePlain text, APA or BibTeXShowHide
Cite this page
Sato Hub. "Jupiter vs 1inch." Sato Hub, updated 2026-10-27, accessed 2026-10-27. https://satohub.ai/compare/jupiter-vs-1inchData last refreshed 2026-10-27; this page is rebuilt daily. Citations carry the date so a reader can tell which snapshot a claim came from. Catalog data is licensed CC-BY-4.0.
Join the Sato Hub Briefing
Sign up for the Briefing: the agents, tools, and infrastructure that actually shipped, and why they matter.