Quant Flow
Open-source LLM-driven trading agent for Hyperliquid perpetuals and grid strategies, with order execution and risk limits kept in deterministic code.
- Sato Score42
- ChainsHyperliquid
Quant Flow is a trading tool on Hyperliquid, with last code activity on 2026-09-18 (Recent). Latest release on 2026-09-18. Sato Score 42/100 (how open, active and verifiable it is, not a safety grade), as of 2026-11-11. How the score works →
See the evidence behind Quant Flow →Last commit Sep 18, 2026 · Last release Sep 18, 2026 · ★ 42
Listed from github.com/web3spreads/quant-flow on 2026-09-25. Install: not attempted — no install path on record. Evidence →
Next step
Watch Quant Flow
One email if what we observe changes — its repo goes quiet or disappears, or the listing is retired. Nothing else.
Check it from your agent
Add Sato Hub’s MCP server (no key), then ask:
https://satohub.ai/api/mcpRun Sato Hub Preflight on web3spreads/quant-flow before I use it.Your project?
Prove you control the domain and correct this page — description, links, tags, chains. A claim proves control, not verification: it never changes the Sato Score.
Claim this listing →Overview
Python trading agent for Hyperliquid where the LLM only emits structured JSON decisions (BUY / SELL_SHORT / CLOSE / HOLD, or grid direction and width); order placement, take-profit/stop-loss and risk controls run in deterministic code so a model failure cannot become a trade. Two strategies (perpetuals, grid) share one entry point and can run in parallel; runs against Hyperliquid testnet by default; uv and Docker install. Community-built, not affiliated with Hyperliquid; the README states it is for study and research only. Performance, profitability and safety are not verified here.
Sato Score
42/100· MediumHow open, active & verifiable — not a safety or returns grade.
- Maintenance & liveness
- 25/35
- Code transparency
- 10/20
- Interface verifiability
- 0/10
- Docs & demo
- 0/10
- Listing transparency & provenance
- 5/15
- Independent verification
- 2/10
Evidence — listed vs checked · what the words mean
Listed from github.com/web3spreads/quant-flow on 2026-09-25. Install: not attempted — no install path on record.
| Claim | Value | Evidence | Source | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chains supported | Hyperliquid | self-reported | github.com/web3spreads/quant-flow | as of 2026-11-11 |
| Verification status | Unverified — not independently reviewed | self-reported | github.com/web3spreads/quant-flow | as of 2026-11-11 |
| Recent activity | last release 2026-09-18 · last commit 2026-09-18 | observed | github.com/web3spreads/quant-flow | 2026-11-11 |
| Website answers | answered (HTTP 200) | observed | github.com/web3spreads/quant-flow | 2026-11-11 |
| Daily check record | 44 of 46 daily checks since 2026-09-26 succeededa success rate of our checks, not uptime; the source is this listing's own history | observed | — | 2026-11-10 |
| Sato Score | 42/100 (Medium)how open, active and verifiable — not a safety or quality grade | computed | satohub.ai | 2026-11-11 |
Self-reported rows are the project’s own words, dated when we recorded them — not a check. Only reproduced and reviewed rows carry a mark. None of these rows is a safety or quality rating.
Observed record — 47 daily checks since 2026-09-26
- Succeeded
- 45
- Failed
- 2
- Their error
- 1
- Unattributed
- 1
State changed on 2026-09-29 (responding → failing), 2026-09-30 (failing → responding), 2026-11-09 (responding → unreachable from our probe), 2026-11-10 (unreachable from our probe → responding).
This is the share of our daily checks that succeeded — not an availability guarantee. A check can fail because the host was down, because our runner timed out, or because the network in between dropped it, and only the first of those is a fact about this project. Failures are split by what we can attribute; anything we cannot attribute is counted, not hidden.
Last 30 days — to 2026-11-11, one point per UTC day
A gap is a day we have no attributable observation — never a zero. Thirty points is the whole shape the free layer carries; the daily rows behind it stay in the snapshot series.
Details
- Chains
- Hyperliquid
- Agent types
- Trading Agent
- Open source
- Unknown
- Pricing
- Free / open-source
- Last checked
- 2026-11-11
Marketplace Signals
No marketplace signals recorded for this resource yet.
Verification status reflects evidence reviewed by Sato Hub. Self-reported claims are never presented as verified.
Where Quant Flow fits
Related concepts: How Agents Interact With Smart Contracts, How Agents Use Wallets
Listing History
Recorded changes to Quant Flow's listing — status, verification, Sato Score, and recent releases. Full history is kept in the listing record.
- Sep 26, 2026Edited: entity class
- Sep 26, 2026Sato Hub began tracking this listing
- Sep 25, 2026Listed on Sato Hub
Compared with
Related Resources
Coinbase AgentKit
ActiveCoinbase's toolkit for giving AI agents wallets and the ability to take onchain actions.
Hyperliquid
ActiveOnchain perpetual futures and spot DEX running on its own L1 with an HyperEVM smart-contract layer.
ElizaOS
ActiveOpen-source TypeScript framework for building crypto-native multi-agent systems.
Reference
QuestionsWhat people ask about this pageShowHide
Questions people ask about Quant Flow
- Is Quant Flow open source?
- Unknown. Sato Hub has not found a public repository or a license statement for Quant Flow as of 2026-11-11.
- Which chains does Quant Flow support?
- Quant Flow lists support for Hyperliquid as of 2026-11-11.
- Is Quant Flow still maintained?
- The most recent code activity Sato Hub observed was on 2026-09-18 (last commit 2026-09-18, last release 2026-09-18), which Sato Hub labels "Recent". Posts on X are not counted as maintenance. Activity is a recency signal, not a quality judgment.
- How do I install or run Quant Flow?
- Sato Hub has no deploy spec for Quant Flow; follow the project's own documentation at https://github.com/web3spreads/quant-flow.
- Is Quant Flow verified on Sato Hub?
- No independent verification is on record for Quant Flow; its verification status is "Unverified" and its Sato Score is 42 of 100. Self-reported is not verified, and the score is not a safety, quality or returns grade.
Cite this pagePlain text, APA or BibTeXShowHide
Cite this page
Sato Hub. "Quant Flow — Sato Hub." Sato Hub, updated 2026-11-11, accessed 2026-11-11. https://satohub.ai/resources/quant-flowData last refreshed 2026-11-11; this page is rebuilt daily. Citations carry the date so a reader can tell which snapshot a claim came from. Catalog data is licensed CC-BY-4.0.
Join the Sato Hub Briefing
Sign up for the Briefing: the agents, tools, and infrastructure that actually shipped, and why they matter.