ElizaOS vs Almanak
Same axes, every row read live from the directory. No winner declared.
- ElizaOS Sato Score87
- Almanak Sato Score83
- Updated2026-10-27
Both are listed as agent frameworks, which makes this the rarer kind of comparison: a genuine like-for-like. The question people actually bring is whether to build on the large, general, plugin-heavy framework or the narrower, strategy-shaped one, and that is a question about what you are building rather than about which project is better.
The table below is the evidence the directory holds on both: how open each is, when each last moved in public, what an agent can call, and whether the documented install has been reproduced. Read the openness and maintenance rows first — for a framework you will live inside for months, they matter more than any feature list.
ElizaOS
ActiveOpen-source TypeScript framework for building crypto-native multi-agent systems.
Almanak
ActiveAn AI-agent framework and non-custodial vault protocol for designing, backtesting, and deploying automated DeFi yield and trading strategies.
On the same axes
| ElizaOS | Almanak | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Agent Framework | Agent Framework |
| Chains | Solana, Ethereum, Base, Multichain | Multichain, Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Avalanche, Polygon, BNB Chain, Monad, Solana, Berachain |
| Interfaces | sdk | ui |
| Standards | — | — |
| Open source | Yes | Partial |
| Listing status | Active | Active |
| Last commit or release | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-09 |
| Last release | 2026-10-05 | 2026-10-09 |
| Install proofA reproduced install means the documented setup was actually run, not that the project is safe. | Reproduced install | Reproduced install |
| VerificationSelf-reported is not verified. Only Verified and Audited are earned states. | Unverified | Self-Reported |
| Sato ScoreHow open, active and verifiable the project is — not a safety, quality or returns grade. | 87 | 83 |
| GitHub starsA popularity signal, not a quality one. Listed last for that reason. | 19,634 | 61 |
Pick ElizaOS if
- ·You want a broad, general-purpose agent framework with a large plugin surface and a lot of existing integration code to read.
- ·You expect to wire several chains and several services into one agent rather than specialising.
- ·You value an active public repository you can fork and debug yourself over a managed surface.
Pick Almanak if
- ·Your agent is a trading or strategy agent first, and a conversational one second or not at all.
- ·You prefer a narrower framework shaped around the problem you actually have over a general one you must shape yourself.
- ·You are comfortable with whatever the openness row below says about it — check it before committing, because it is the row that decides how much of this you can fix yourself.
What this cannot tell you
Neither Sato Score is a security assessment, and a framework score says nothing about the code you will write inside it. The rows that matter most here — how much of each is published as source, and how recently each moved — are also the rows most likely to have changed since you last looked, which is why they are read live rather than written down. If either will hold signing keys, read its key-handling code yourself before it holds anything worth taking.
Related
Reference
QuestionsWhat people ask about this pageShowHide
Questions this comparison answers
- Is ElizaOS or Almanak more actively maintained?
- ElizaOS is an open-source framework by elizaOS on Solana, Ethereum, Base and 1 more chains, last commit or release 2026-10-21, with a Sato Score of 87 out of 100 as of 2026-10-27. Almanak is a partly open-source framework by Almanak on Multichain, Ethereum, Arbitrum and 8 more chains, last commit or release 2026-10-09, with a Sato Score of 83 out of 100 as of 2026-10-27. Activity is a recency signal from public commits, releases and posts, not a quality judgment.
- Which one is open source?
- ElizaOS: Yes. Almanak: Partial. "Unknown" means Sato Hub found no license statement.
- Does Sato Hub declare a winner?
- No. Every row is read live from the directory and the page names what the data cannot settle. Neither Sato Score is a security assessment, and a framework score says nothing about the code you will write inside it. The rows that matter most here — how much of each is published as source, and how recently each moved — are also the rows most likely to have changed since you last looked, which is why they are read live rather than written down. If either will hold signing keys, read its key-handling code yourself before it holds anything worth taking.
SourcesWhere the data comes fromShowHide
Sources — both projects' repositories and docs
Cite this pagePlain text, APA or BibTeXShowHide
Cite this page
Sato Hub. "ElizaOS vs Almanak." Sato Hub, updated 2026-10-27, accessed 2026-10-28. https://satohub.ai/compare/elizaos-vs-almanakData last refreshed 2026-10-27; this page is rebuilt daily. Citations carry the date so a reader can tell which snapshot a claim came from. Catalog data is licensed CC-BY-4.0.
Join the Sato Hub Briefing
Sign up for the Briefing: the agents, tools, and infrastructure that actually shipped, and why they matter.